I thought the woman in the photo looked great in her black outfit. I mean, she could have used a little sparkle, maybe a red or just rhinestone heart-shaped pin, or dangling little spakling hearts at her ears. Otherwise, she looked lovely.

aol of you label the article MUST HAVE ONLY $3...you should make it clear what is $3

The $3 item is on page 6 - it's a ring with hearts cut out on it and it's at Forever 21.

so whats the $3.00?

Really? Special clutches and purses and "must have" necklaces? That's a turn on for a guy to see on his date? Well Heidi must know what she's talking about. After all, her marriage worked out well.....

Heidi does a hair commercial with her dark roots showing. Can't she afford to keep up with her hair coloring? I hate when actresses and models have their dark roots showing. It makes them look cheap and sluty.

Take this from a guy who's been up and down and around the block a few times. If I care about you, if I'm in love with you, if you're wearing a burlap sack, you are beautiful. In fact, there are woman who are so lovely they could wear just that--a burlap sack and outshine everyone in the room. C'mon, women, admit it: you don't dress for the guy, you dress to impress other women. It's like getting flowers delived to you at work. Women love that...just to impress other women.

What's the "must have" that costs only $3.00?

Personally, I thought the lady in the black dress was totally perfect! She could have
pinned a pretty red rose in her hair, just to give the whole picture a little kick, but she did
look lovely and I'm sure by now, she's engaged.

So it was a cheap silver ring? $2.80 Did I miss it? I wouldn't be caught dead in that ring-if that was the big tip, someone missed the boat.